Rowland Co. v. Kell Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action on contract; from Clarke superior court — Judge Cobb. October 26, 1920.
1DissentJenkins, P. J.
It is with a good deal of reluctance that the writer ventures to dissent from the conclusion which his colleagues have announced in this case. Not only is he impressed with the line of reasoning offered in support of the rule laid down, but he recognizes that the view here presented may seem on its face to ’run counter to the general trend and current of modern authority. Still, we are dealing with fundamentals, and however broad and liberal the right of amendment has grown to be, there yet remain three absolute limitations upon the legal exercise of this valuable right and privilege. There…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Scovill v. GlasnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Hurst v. Detroit City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Kennedy v. ManryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Steele Lumber Co. v. Laurens Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.