Legal Opinion

G-Fours, Inc. v. Charles A. Miele and Intersurance Systems Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 24, 1974No. 589, Docket 73-2386PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Charles A. Miele and his wife Ethel appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Walter R. Mansfield, J., 1 which held Ethel Miele in contempt for refusing to answer certain written interrogatories regarding her husband’s assets. Mrs. Miele had asserted a marital privilege not to reply to various questions, but the judge rejected this claim. Because we believe that the marital privilege was not available, we affirm the contempt order although on a partially different theory from that relied on by the district…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Parkhurst v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. United States v. Walter P. MacKiewicz and Florence B. MacKiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  3. People v. DaghitaNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Thomas E. BreiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. People v. MelskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of ArgentinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. Ranney-Brown Distributors, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1977
  3. Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc. v. McMurrayDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1998
  4. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Triad Petroleum, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  5. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Triad Petroleum, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API