Legal Opinion

Peck v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1878PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Montcalm. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Plaintiff in error recovered judgment against the Grand Rapids, Rockford & Greenville Railroad Company, which was organized in 1870, for arrearages due on a contract made in 1872 to construct a portion of its line. This contract embraced the usual items of construction, including earthwork, clearing, bridging, culverts, ties, timber, piles and other items. The whole indebtedness created was between $40,000 and $50,000, of which about $20,000 was paid. The judgment was for the remainder. Defendant Miller is found to have been a stockholder in 1872, but the amount of his stock is not found.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aikin v. . WassonNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Hanson v. DonkersleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Kent v. . the New-York Central Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1855

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Marshall v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Tuttle v. National Bank of the Republic of St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. In re the Assignment of George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. May v. BlackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Lang v. SimmonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API