Legal Opinion
United States v. John Henry Long
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 17, 1976No. 74-2536PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District Judge. PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from a conviction under an indictment charging Defendant-Appellant John Henry Long with two sales of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We affirm.
1. Appellant’s principal contention is that the trial court erred in quashing a subpoena served upon the government’s informant.
The government provided appellant with the name of the informant but not his whereabouts. Appellant subpoenaed the informant pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 17(b). The informant was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Roberto Gomez-Rojas, and Michael Rece SutherlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. David BuenoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Cleveland Burgess v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Oscar Ordonez, German Hernandez Garcia, AKA Jaime RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Fabio Jaramillo-SuarezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jose Luis Pizarro and Miguel RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Ronald Lee BrambleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Sai Keung Wong, United States of America v. Sui Keung Chan, United States of America v. Pak Chuen IpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.