Legal Opinion

Brock v. County of Fresno

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 5, 2025No. 1:18-cv-01615Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ERNEST O’NEIL RAHKIN BROCK, Case No. 1:18-cv-01615-LHR-EPG guardian ad litem Karen Norris, 10 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Plaintiff, RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S 11 MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PROPOSED v. SETTLEMENT BE GRANTED, IN PART 12 COUNTY OF FRESNO ON BEHALF OF (ECF Nos. 80, 88) 13 FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 14 FOURTEEN (14) DAYS Defendant. 15 16 In this civil action, Plaintiff Ernest O’Neil Rahkin Brock, an incompetent adult, proceeds 17 through his guardian ad litem,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Dionisio v. Dacanay and Reynaldo C. Dacanay, by His Father and Next Friend v. Saturnina Mendoza, Victor P. Mendoza, and Doe Insurance Co. No. 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Robidoux v. RosengrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Smith v. City of StocktonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API