Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided July 27, 2018No. 2608 A-12390PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judge WOLLENBERG.

A jury found James Earl Smith guilty of first-degree robbery, first-degree burglary, second-degree assault, and second-degree theft in connection with a home invasion. At Smith's sentencing, the trial court merged the theft, but not the assault, into the robbery conviction.

On appeal, Smith argues that Alaska's double jeopardy clause requires the merger of the robbery and the assault into a single conviction. Smith also argues that the judgment fails to properly reflect the merger of the robbery and the theft into a single conviction. We agree with Smith on both points and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Whitton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Marks v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Ebertz v. EbertzAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Nell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API