Legal Opinion

Stadler v. Hertz

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1884Published

FROM MADISON. Appeal from the Chancery Court at Jackson. H. "W. McCorry, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtDeaderick, C. J.

The bill is filed attacking a deed of trust, to secure creditors as fraudulent. The deed is made by, defendants, Morris Hertz & Co., and Secures debts due to-their co-defendants, most of which are impeached as fictitious. This is denied by the creditors and trustee, and there is no evidence to sustain the allegation. The oath to the answers of defendants was waived, and they were signed by their solicitors only. A motion was made to take the answers from the file because not signed by defendants. This motion was overruled by the chancellor.

During the term at which the cause was tried, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shepard v. AkersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API