Legal Opinion · Dissent

Askew v. Hardman

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 11, 1994No. 930537-CAPublished

1DissentOrme, Associate Presiding Judge

I respectfully dissent. Because of a perceived pre trial discovery glitch, and the mere theoretical possibility that some earth-shattering evidence might have been found in the insurance adjuster’s file, the majority gives plaintiff a new trial. Without regard to what plaintiff might actually have found in the file, plaintiff gets a whole new bite at the apple — a second chance to select jurors, interrogate and cross-examine witnesses, argue for and against jury instructions, and argue to a jury. Not only is this unfair to defendant, it needlessly burdens the system. A second staging of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re California Public Utilities Commission. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Steffensen v. Smith's Management Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API