Askew v. Hardman
Court of Appeals of Utah
1DissentOrme, Associate Presiding Judge
I respectfully dissent. Because of a perceived pre trial discovery glitch, and the mere theoretical possibility that some earth-shattering evidence might have been found in the insurance adjuster’s file, the majority gives plaintiff a new trial. Without regard to what plaintiff might actually have found in the file, plaintiff gets a whole new bite at the apple — a second chance to select jurors, interrogate and cross-examine witnesses, argue for and against jury instructions, and argue to a jury. Not only is this unfair to defendant, it needlessly burdens the system. A second staging of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re California Public Utilities Commission. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Steffensen v. Smith's Management Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.