Legal Opinion
Danek v. Hommer
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 10, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
9 N.J. 56 (1952)
87 A.2d 5
JOHN DANEK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JULIUS J. HOMMER AND KATHERYN HOMMER, PARTNERS TRADING AS HOMMER TOOL & MFG. CO., DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, AND NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURING CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 11, 1952.
Decided March 10, 1952.
Mr. Meyer M. Semel argued the cause for the appellant.
Mr. Joseph Weintraub argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. McGlynn, Weintraub & Stein, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carlo v. the Okonite-Callender Cable Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- United States Casualty Co. v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Sexton ex rel. Kin v. Newark District Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Blackman v. IlesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Danek v. HommerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dudley v. Victor Lynn Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960