Legal Opinion

Ray-O-Vac Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1974No. Appeal No. 1568 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

This is an appeal from an award of compensation by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board. The referee had denied compensation, finding that the claimant-appellee had failed to prove an accident. The referee found that at the time of the alleged accident, claimant-appellee was doing her usual and customary work, and that prior to that time, she suffered from obesity, hypertension, diabetes and arteriosclerosis, which conditions predisposed her to the development of thrombosis. Finally, the referee found that there was no causal relationship between the work she…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. TheisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. International Furnace Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Jones v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Scarpelli v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Lisi v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API