American Federation of State Employees, Council 25 v. Wayne County
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.
Defendant appeals by leave granted a circuit court order that compelled arbitration of this dispute over retiree health benefits. For the reasons set forth *350below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.1
Defendant argues that it is not required to arbitrate this dispute because the contract in question provides for arbitration only of those claims that arose during the term of the parties’ collective-bargaining agreement (CBA).2 There exists “a strong presumption in favor of using negotiated grievance procedures for resolving disputes over the interpretation or application of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Quality Products and Concepts Co. v. Nagel Precision, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Kloian v. Domino's Pizza, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Federation of State Employees, Council 25 v. Hamtramck Housing CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- 36th District Court v. Michigan American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees Council 25, Local 917Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012