Legal Opinion

American Law Book Co. v. Later

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1927No. 4666PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Upon breach, by the purchaser, of a title-retaining contract of sale providing for instalment payments, prefaced by the agreement: “which I agree to take and to pay for as follows:” with the further agreement in case of default to return the property, the seller has two remedies; the collection of the remainder of the purchase price, or, second, the retaking of the property. (Pease v. Teller Corp., 22 Ida. 807, 128 Pac. 981; Thienes v. Francis, 69 Or. 171, 134 Pac. 1195, 138 Pac. 845; Manganese Steel Safe Co. v. First Nat. Bank, 25 S. D. 119, 125 N. W. 572; Sioux Falls Adjustment Co. v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pease v. Teller Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Arthur E. Guth Piano Co. v. AdamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  3. Thienes v. FrancisOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Manganese Steel Safe Co. v. First State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Sioux Falls Adjustment Co. v. AikensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shipman v. KloppenburgIdaho Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API