Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pinto v. State Civil Service Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 2006No. 70 MAP 2005 and 71 MAP 2005Published

1DissentJustice Newman

The Majority concludes that Roy C. Pinto (Pinto) was on “leave of absence to take a non-civil service position” and, therefore, was not subject to the political activity prohibition of Section 905b of the Civil Service Act, 71 Pa.C.S. § 905(b). I must respectfully disagree and, accordingly, I dissent.

I believe that an analysis of the relevant statutes demonstrates that employees released from their regular state workplace for union activities, union business, or any other employee organizational purpose pursuant to a paid leave agreement are actually still active employees on active duty. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. Jerome Genova, Lawrence Gulotta, and Jerome StackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Robert D. Alexander v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API