Legal Opinion

King v. Salvation Army

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated May 28, 1996, as denied those branches of their cross motion which were to compel the plaintiff to answer certain questions propounded at an examination before trial and to respond to a notice for discovery and inspection dated February 29, 1996.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied the defendants’ motion to compel the plaintiff to answer certain questions propounded at an examination…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Manley v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Cruz v. Roman Catholic Church for Most Holy TrinityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. DeStrange v. LindAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. McGuire v. ZarlengoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. McLane v. DamianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Daniels v. Fairfield Presidential Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Di Chiara v. Kaleida HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API