Legal Opinion

Siclana v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 24, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

Libelant’s motion for an order dismissing respondent's* exceptions to the libel herein, is denied.

Grace lane, Inc., excepted to the sufficiency of the libel on two grounds, viz.:

1. That the facts averred in the libel are insufficient to constitute a cause of action.

2. That the facts averred in the libel do not constitute a cause of action within the Admiralty and Maritime jurisdiction of this court.

The allegations of the libel are rather confusing. At the outset it is stated:

“The libel of Miguel Siclana against Grace Line, Inc., for recovery of damages for injuries…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Warren v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  2. Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API