Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lucenti v. Laviero

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 18, 2018No. SC 19723Published

1DissentEveleigh, J.

I respectfully dissent. Unlike the majority, in my view, the plaintiff, Dominick Lucenti, has demonstrated the existence of a genuine issue of material fact with respect to whether the defendants, Greg Laviero and Martin Laviero Contractors, Inc. (Laviero Contractors), subjectively believed that the altered excavator made the plaintiff's injuries substantially certain to occur. Accordingly, I would reverse the judgment of the Appellate Court.

I agree with the facts and procedural history set forth in the majority opinion. "The standard of review of a trial court's decision granting summary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  3. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Jett v. DunlapSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. Travelers Indem. Co. v. PCR INC.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API