Legal Opinion
Lattanzio v. Lattanzio
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 23, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered November 27, 2006, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the eight and ninth causes of action and denied the cross motion of defendants Nicholas Lattanzio and Live Oak Capital, LLC for summary judgment dismissing the first, fourth, eighth, and ninth causes of action and their motion for leave to further amend the answer, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The motion court did not improperly deny leave to defendants to further amend their answer, because…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moon v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Birdsall v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Wujin Nanxiashu Secant Factory v. Ti-Well International Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Hanford v. Plaza Packaging Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- Endothelix, Inc. v. Vasomedical, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Robb v. RobbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Robb v. RobbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Atlas MF Mezzanine Borrower, LLC v. Macquarie Tex. Loan Holder LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020