Legal Opinion
United States v. Darryl Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 30, 1991No. 90-5293PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Chief Judge.
This appeal represents another in the continuing series of cases in which this court and other courts of appeals throughout the country have considered issues raised by the recently promulgated United States Sentencing Guidelines as part of the “evolutionary process” contemplated by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, Pub.L. No. 98-473, 98 Stat.1987 (1984). See United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.), Ch. 1, Pt. A, intro. 3.
I
Appellant Darryl Johnson and codefend-ant James Price were named in a five-count indictment arising out of the armed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Kikumura, YuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ryan, JeremiahCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Jaime L. FerraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jack W. BierleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Joseph Neal RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. Arthur LiebermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. John BairdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. George P. SalemoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Curtis Delaskio MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.