Legal Opinion

Hall v. Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1908No. Appeal, No. 185PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 185, April T., 1908, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Crawford Co., Feb. T., 1907; No. 63, on verdict for plaintiff in casé of Francis M. Hall v. The Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Prather, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $1,000. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was in refusing binding instructions for defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

Upon a dark evening in January of 1906, the plaintiff alighted from a passenger train of the defendant at its station in Conneautville. The platform of the station is some eighty feet in length. It appears by the testimony, and is practically conceded in the appellant’s argument, that, although there were three outside lamps at the station buildings, none of them were lighted on this occasion and the only light upon the platform came from a lamp in the operator’s room. In making his way from the train over the platform to the street, the plaintiff struck his foot against…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Windle v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Greb v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Donohue v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Clunn v. Williamsport & North Branch RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Mellen v. D.L. W.R.R. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API