Legal Opinion
Held v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided June 12, 1997No. 14-94-01146-CRPublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
Jack Gilbert Held appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated. Raising six points of error, he argues that the trial court erred by (1) overruling his Batson challenge, (2) admitting an officer’s testimony on the administration of horizontal gaze nystagmus testing when he was not qualified as an expert, (3) admitting the results of an intoxi-lyzer test, (4) permitting expert testimony on the level of alcohol concentration at which an individual loses his normal physical and mental capabilities, (5) permitting the expert to respond to hypothetical questions…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- State v. Tarvin, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Fisher, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
- State v. Arriaga, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Gonzales v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.