People ex rel. Niles v. Smith
New York Supreme Court
MOTION to quash proceedings in forcible entry and detainer.
1Opinion of the CourtBirdseye, J.
When the proceedings in a case like the present are brought into this court on certiorari, it is clearly within the power of the court to examine them, and to quash them, if found irregular or insufficient. That -was done in The People v. Reed, (11 Wend. 157.) It cannot be that this court can be compelled to go through with these proceedings, without having the power or the opportunity to examine and *17ascertain whether jurisdiction has been obtained, of the subject matter, or of the parties; and whether the statutory prerequisites have been complied with. And if such an inquiry is ever to be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Willard v. WarrenNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Farrington v. MorganNew York Supreme Court · 1838
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fults v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Winterfield v. StaussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- United States Ex Rel. Horelick v. Criminal Court of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Potter v. New York Baptist Mission SocietyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
- Fuchs v. CohenNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.