Dunn v. State

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

We withdraw our opinion filed June 22, 1994, and substitute the following opinion which deletes our incorrect statement that defendant was convicted of burglary of a dwelling. Defendant’s Motion for Clarification is granted.

Defendant, after separate trials, was convicted of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and grand theft. He filed a pro se motion in both cases seeking dismissal of his court appointed counsel alleging that he was not receiving effective assistance of counsel. We consolidate the two appeals and reverse.

In Nelson v. State, 274 So.2d 256…