Legal Opinion

NASR International Trading Co. v. Rahul International Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 26, 1996No. 95-253PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We find no merit in the points raised on appeal. On the cross-appeal, however, section 68.065(1), Florida Statutes (1991), requires an award of three times the $16,634.60 bad check issued by Nasr International Trading Co., Inc. in addition to, rather than including, the face amount of the check. Krontz v. Feiler, 553 So. 2d 1302 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Hence, the judgment on this basis for Rahul International, Inc., and against Nasr International Trading Co., Inc., shall be increased after remand from $49,-903.80 ($16,634.60 + 2 x $16,634.60) to $66,-538.40 ($16,634.60 + 3 x $16,634.60).

Affir…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Krontz v. FeilerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. OCALA JOCKEY CLUB, LLC v. RogersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  2. BEO MANAGEMENT CORP. v. JORGE M. CABALLE HORTA, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  3. Continental Insurance Company v. Vacuum Dig Enterprises, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API