Legal Opinion

Thacker v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 22, 1931No. 6 Div. 998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Charge B, the giving of which was held by the Court of Appeals to be reversible error, has been in effect held by this court not to be an incorrect statement of the law and not reversible error to give it. Tatum v. State, 131 Ala. 32, 31 So. 369; Crittenden v. State, 134 Ala. 145, 32 So. 273; Jones v. State, 176 Ala. 20, 24, 58 So. 250; Porter v. State, 55 Ala. 95.

Likewise charge C has been approved by this court and the Court of Appeals. Jackson v. State, 117 Ala. 155, 23 So. 47; Kilgore v. State, 74 Ala. 1; Porter v. State, 55 Ala. 95, 107; Wray v. State, 2 Ala. App. 140, 57 So. 144; Wiley…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kilgore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Mayberry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. Chaney v. Burford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. Noel v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. State v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Garrison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API