Legal Opinion

People v. Curtis

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1986No. Crim. 13461PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

Defendant John Benton Curtis appeals from a judgment extending his commitment as a mentally disordered sex offender (MDSO). (la) For reasons discussed later, his trial began 28 days before his release date, in violation of former Welfare & Institutions Code section 6316.2, subdivision (d), which required his trial to begin no later than 30 days before his release date. He contends the statutory time limit is jurisdictional and that his trial was barred. However, we conclude the statutory time limit is directory, not jurisdictional. Since defendant’s trial was completed 27 days…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. French v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In Re MoyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Edwards v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. GoodeSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. People v. FernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Garcetti v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. People v. KirklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API