Cedillo v. TransCor America, LLC
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant TransCor America, LLC’s (“TransCor” or “Defendant”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (Docket- No. 54). ■ Plaintiffs, inmates transported by TransCor, filed a Response in Opposition to the Motion (Docket No. 57),. to which Defendant replied (Docket No. 59). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion will be granted.
I. SUMMARY OF THE FACTS
Plaintiffs in this class action case are inmates transported by Defendant for a period of more than 59 continuous hours on or after February 14, 2006, and, who were members of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Card v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
- Hanover American Insurance Company v. Tattooed Millionaire Entertainment, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2023
- Southall v. USF Holland, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021