Legal Opinion

Ascheim v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1997No. 2683 C.D. 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue before this Court requires us to examine what is required for predating in certain unemployment compensation cases.

Cappy Ascheim (Claimant) appeals from the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (UCBR) that affirmed the referee’s denial of predating Claimant’s benefits. We affirm.

Claimant filed for unemployment compensation benefits effective September 24, 1995, following his separation from Sachs Real Estate Company. The Pennsylvania Job Service initially denied Claimant benefits which Claimant timely appealed. Upon filing his appeal the Job Service informed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zinicola v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kroh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Kroh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API