Legal Opinion
Schroeder v. County of Atlantic
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 3, 2014PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MENDEZ, A.J.S.C.
A verified complaint in lieu of prerogative writ and order to show cause was filed on May 29, 2014, by plaintiff against the defendants. Plaintiff claims that defendants have violated Ordinance No. 10, Atlantic County’s “pay to play” ordinance, in awarding Ford-Scott & Associates (hereinafter “Ford-Scott”) a county contract after the firm had contributed monies to Sheriff Frank Bailes’ State Senate campaign. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the court finds that defendants have violated Ordinance No. 10. The court grants the plaintiffs request for relief, ordering the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re the Closing of Jamesburg High SchoolSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Real v. Radir Wheels, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Borough of Princeton v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer Cty.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- William B. Blount v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Shapiro v. Essex Cty. Freeholders Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- NEW JERSEY BANKERS ASSOCIATION v. GREWALDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021