Legal Opinion

Eubanks v. Zimmerman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 10, 1973No. 73-44PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

The appellants, Florence Eu-banks, individually and as guardian of the person of James Huey. Eubanks, and the First National Bank, as guardian of his estate, appeal from an adverse holding in a tax redemption suit initiated by them. The issue on appeal appears limited to whether three distinct disabilities can be connected (tacked) so that the guardian of the incompetent can redeem land, once held in a co-tenancy (with the personal guardian) by the incompetent, some 25 years after a tax forfeiture sale.

In 1945 Mrs. Eubanks purchased a 40 acre tract of land in her name and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dan D. Diamond v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Smith v. Pettus, CuratorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Reed v. MoneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  4. Carter v. CantrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. ShuckCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  2. Small v. KulesaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API