South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Mayer
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Chandler, Acting Chief Justice:
*103On appeal is an Order of the master-in-equity holding that Appellant (Insurance Company) is not entitled to reimbursement of $16,000 paid to Respondent (Mayer) under the “additional living expenses” clause of her homeowner’s insurance policy. We affirm.
FACTS
Mayer maintained homeowner’s coverage from Insurance Company on her house in McClellanville. The policy contained an “additional living expenses” clause, providing that:
If a loss covered under this Section makes that part of the residence premises where you reside uninhabitable, we cover the necessary…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Marlowe v. Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973