Legal Opinion

South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Mayer

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 22, 1994No. 24015Published

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Acting Chief Justice:

*103On appeal is an Order of the master-in-equity holding that Appellant (Insurance Company) is not entitled to reimbursement of $16,000 paid to Respondent (Mayer) under the “additional living expenses” clause of her homeowner’s insurance policy. We affirm.

FACTS

Mayer maintained homeowner’s coverage from Insurance Company on her house in McClellanville. The policy contained an “additional living expenses” clause, providing that:

If a loss covered under this Section makes that part of the residence premises where you reside uninhabitable, we cover the necessary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marlowe v. Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API