Legal Opinion

Bartsch v. Seneca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order entered September 28, 1964, herein appealed from, unanimously modified on the law to strike the provision directing payment of counsel fee for petitioner in the sum of $750, and as so modified is otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements to either party. In this filiation and support proceeding respondent appeared on the return day and acknowledged paternity of the infant. The question then remaining was what provision should be made for support of such infant. While the court has power, once an order of filiation is made, to allow counsel fees to the attorney for the mother,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anonymous v. AnonymousNew York Court of Special Session · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mary E. C. v. Donald S.New York City Family Court · 1981
  2. Pamela J. D. v. Terence F. D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API