Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Smithfield Unit of Texas Honey Ball Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1927No. 11830. [fn*]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

In the year 1923, or prior thereto, H. M. Means, demonstration agent for Tarrant county, Ireland Hampton, then the manager of the Chamber of Commerce of Fort Worth, J. W. Lee, and T. H. Adkins, formed a partnership to be operated under the trade-name of Texas Honey Ball Association. Lee was to» furnish to the farmers, through the Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce, the seed of a hybrid cantaloupe, a cross between the Honey Dew cantaloupe and the Cannon Ball cantaloupe. Means was to look after the planting and cultivation of the cantaloupes by the farmers. Hampton was to look after the advertising…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mayhew & Isbell Lumber Co. v. Valley Wells Truck Growers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Gulf, Western Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BrowneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Knight v. HollomanTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Pearce v. LandesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API