Dunlop v. Dunlop
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT, [Cited, Cummings v. Cummings, 133 Ky. 1, 117 S. W. 289; Muir v. Muir, 133 Ky. 125, 28 Ky. L. 1355, 92 S. W. 314, 4 L. R. A. (N. S.) 909; Miller v. Miller, 141 Ky. 681, 133 S. W. 588.]
1Opinion of the Court
*189Opinion by
Judge Pryor:
The parties to this action were married in the state of Virginia on the 6th of February in the year 1878, and in a few days removed to the home of the husband at or near Louisville, Kentucky. The wife returned to the home of her parents in about five or six months after the, marriage, where she has since remained.
The husband has continued to reside in Kentucky, and on the 19th of February, 1879, the wife instituted this action against him, in the Louisville Chancery Court, for a divorce and alimony on the grounds of the existence of an alleged loathsome disease upon him…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Muir v. MuirCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Cummings v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Muir v. MuirCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Cummings v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Mellen v. MellenNew York Supreme Court · 1882
- Whitaker v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932