Howard v. Howard

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying that part of defendant’s motion seeking maintenance without conducting a hearing. Although the parties provided relevant financial information, a hearing is required to determine, inter alia, the pre-separation standard of living and economic needs of defendant (see, Hartog v Hartog, 85 NY2d 36, 52). The court further erred in determining plaintiff’s child support obligation based…