Ford Motor Co. v. Potter
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MOREMEN, Judge.
Appellants, Ford Motor Company and Fordson Coal Company, hereinafter called Ford, have appealed from a judgment wherein Barton S. Potter and others, hereinafter called Potter, were adjudged to be the owners of a tract of land lying on the headwaters of Ulysses Creek and of Lower Jack’s Creek in Clay County. A ridge separates the two watersheds, and the land, involved here is divided by it into east and west parts. About three-fourths of the land is situated on Lower Jack’s Creek, —or Jaw Bone, its tributary — and the remaining one-fourth on Ulysses Creek.
Ford claims complete…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pearson v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
- H. B. Jones Coal Company v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Kirk v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
- Stoffler v. Edgewater Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Gatliff Coal Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth, Department of Parks v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
- Phillips v. AkersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
- Meade v. SturgillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971