Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Potter

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 11, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOREMEN, Judge.

Appellants, Ford Motor Company and Fordson Coal Company, hereinafter called Ford, have appealed from a judgment wherein Barton S. Potter and others, hereinafter called Potter, were adjudged to be the owners of a tract of land lying on the headwaters of Ulysses Creek and of Lower Jack’s Creek in Clay County. A ridge separates the two watersheds, and the land, involved here is divided by it into east and west parts. About three-fourths of the land is situated on Lower Jack’s Creek, —or Jaw Bone, its tributary — and the remaining one-fourth on Ulysses Creek.

Ford claims complete…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pearson v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
  2. H. B. Jones Coal Company v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Kirk v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
  4. Stoffler v. Edgewater Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Gatliff Coal Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Department of Parks v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  2. Phillips v. AkersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
  3. Meade v. SturgillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API