Legal Opinion

Flex Track Equipment, Ltd. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 12, 1970No. C.D. 4063PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

On February 11, 1965, plaintiffs imported from Canada merchandise invoiced as “10 Bolls Comprising 10-onlt A213 Arctic Track Treads B'JSTllO”. The invoice additionally noted that the merchandise was intended as parts for Muskeg motor tracked vehicles. Plaintiffs entered the merchandise at Blaine, Washington, under the tariff classification for parts of tractors, not suitable for agricultural use, TSUS (Tariff Schedules of the United States) item 692.35, dutiable at 11.5 per centum ad valorem,

*120In its review and liquidation of the entry, customs at Blaine classified the merchandise…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gallagher & Ascher Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. United States v. HorraxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. West Coast Glass Distributors v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Great Western Sugar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. Deere & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Flex Track Equipment Ltd.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  2. Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  3. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  4. Nadel Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API