Legal Opinion

Beltonen v. Gruca and Cozel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1928No. Appeal 1556PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

The defendant delivered to the plaintiff a note containing a warrant for the confession of judgment. It was duly entered of record and thereafter the defendants made a motion to strike it off for the reason that “the precise residence address” of the creditor was not given when the note was presented for entry as provided by the Act of March 31, 1915, P. L. 39.

Section 1 of the Act reads as follows: “That the prothonotary of each county is hereby directed not to enter any judgment unless the judgment creditor, or his duly authorized attorney or agent, produces to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deibert to Use. v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Deibert v. RhodesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Ruggles Truck Sales, Inc. v. Bacastow, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1929
  2. Reinsmith v. McCready, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API