Legal Opinion

Jack D. Tiller v. Review Board of the Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development, IDWD U.I. Claims Adjudication, and the Town of Walkerton

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 2012No. 93A02-1110-EX-961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Jack D. Tiller 1 appeals the decision of the Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development (“the Board”) in favor of IDWD U.I. Claims Adjudication (“IDWD”) on IDWD’s claim that Tiller had falsified information to IDWD in order to receive unemployment benefits. Tiller raises two issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as whether the Board’s decision is erroneous. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 2

On July 27, 2011, the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) held an evidentiary hearing on IDWD’s claim that Tiller had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McClain v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Recker v. Review Bd. of the Ind. Dep't of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Perdue v. GarganoIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Telligman v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Perry v. Unemployment Insurance Review BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Kevin Perry v. Unemployment Insurance Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development and Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development UI ClaimsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Shawn Telligman v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development and Indiana Department of Workforce Development Unemployment Insurance Claims AdjudicationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API