Cagle v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1DissentAndree Layton Roaf, Judge
I would reverse and remand this case for a new trial because the trial court erred in overruling Mr. Cagle’s objection relating to the presence of spectators at the trial who were wearing buttons with the victim’s picture on them. The trial judge refused to take any action whatsoever, and accordingly, I do not agree with the majority that Cagle should be required to demonstrate prejudice under these circumstances.
In the course of the two-day trial, the victim’s family members showed up wearing buttons with the victim’s picture on them. On the first day, Cagle requested that the judge order…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Robert Lee Norris v. Henry Risley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Rhea v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.