Chandler v. Hammett

From the statement of the case it will be seen that the only question here to be decided, and in fact the only-question which is argued, is whether the justice of the peace was authorized to enter the judgment, orally pronounced by him on-June 27, 1944, nunc pro tunc on October 3, 1944. If he was not so authorized under-the law, the judgment should be reversed; if he was, the judgment overruling the motion should be affirmed.

Hnder the Code, § 24-601, subsection 6, the justices of the peace are required “To keep a docket of all causes brought before them,in which must be entered the names of…