Legal Opinion
Fiore v. Zoning Board of Appeals
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 15, 1968PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
This article 78 proceeding has been brought for an order declaring the determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southeast granting the application of the intervenors-appellants for a variance to be null and void and setting the same aside and denying the application.
Petitioners-respondents are nearby residents who objected before the board to the application for this variance. The Appellate Division has affirmed the judgment of the Supreme Court which annulled the determination. The premises of the intervenors-appellants as to which the variance was granted is a three-story…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Matter of Hickox v. GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- People Ex Rel. Hudson-Harlem Valley Title & Mortgage Co. v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
3Cited by30 opinions
- Cave v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v. WeiseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Carriage Works Enterprises, Ltd. v. SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Baskin v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Sheeley v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.