DeWinne v. Waldrep
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge.
While the defendant argues that the plaintiff cannot recover because they, the plaintiff and the defendant, were engaged in an illegal enterprise, to wit: Hunting deer from a track in violation of a Texas Statute, pleaded in the petition, as well as other reasons as to why his demurrers should have been sustained, since the plaintiff’s petition was subject to general demurrer for the following reason these other contentions need not be considered.
Many decisions have been written in Georgia and elsewhere with reference to whether a person, not in a passenger’s seat, is in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. FergusonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Taylor v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Lassiter v. PossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Crane Auto Parts, Stewart Avenue Branch, Inc. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
3Cited by17 opinions
- Union Carbide Corp. v. HoltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Freeman v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Stukes v. TrowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Adams v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Stone v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.