Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Morlitz

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 21, 2018No. 17-3236Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17‐3236 Murphy v. Morlitz, et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tracy v. FreshwaterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Kaufman v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Krumme v. WestPoint Stevens Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  4. IDT Corp. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Zumpano v. QuinnNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API