Legal Opinion
In re Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided February 18, 2014No. MDL No. 2511Published
1Opinion of the Court
TRANSFER ORDER
JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.
Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs in six actions listed on Schedule A and three actions pending in the Southern District of West Virginia and not encompassed by this motion move to centralize this litigation in the Southern District of West Virginia. Defendants DIMA, S.L., Neomedic International, S.L., Neomedic, Inc. and Specialties Remeex International, S.L. (collectively, Neomedie) do not oppose the motion.
The litigation presently consists of seven actions pending in seven districts, as listed *1372on Schedule A.1 The motion…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re American Medical Systems, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In Re Avaulta Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
- In re Cook Medical, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
- In re Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012