Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Philistin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 2012Published

1DissentJustice Saylor

I would award a new trial based upon trial counsel’s patently deficient stewardship in failing to seek redress concerning the atmosphere in which Appellant’s trial was conducted. I also have substantial concerns with the PCRA court’s refusal to entertain evidence about trial counsel’s *34compensation arrangement with the City of Philadelphia. My reasoning follows.

As the majority observes, Appellant’s trial for the killing and maiming of police officers was attended by numerous uniformed policemen. After the jury found Appellant guilty on all charges, a number of these officers cheered to show…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Ronald Woods v. Richard L. DuggerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API