Legal Opinion
Dingle v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 11, 1995PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Titone, J.
In Love v State of New York (78 NY2d 540), this Court held that, in a bifurcated personal injury action, a successful plaintiff is properly awarded prejudgment interest from the date of the decision establishing liability rather than from the date of the damages verdict. The follow-up issue presented in this case is whether an insurer is liable in a bifurcated trial for prejudgment interest on the entire amount of the judgment against its insured, or only for interest on that portion of the judgment the insurer is obligated to pay under the policy limits. We hold…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Love v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Home Indemnity Co. v. CorieNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- Shnarch v. Empire Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Holubetz v. National Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Rodriguez v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by23 opinions
- Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re September 11th Liability Insurance Coverage CasesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Ragins v. Hospitals InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Alejandro v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. National Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.