Legal Opinion

Killingstad v. Meigs

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1911PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: Lawrence W. Halset, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

This action was brought to foreclose a claim for mechanic’s lien. The complaint alleged, among other things, that plaintiff prepared and delivered plans and specifications for a building for which defendant agreed to pay $87.50. On the trial the complaint was amended so as to set up a cause of action on quantum meruit, and it was set forth that the plans and specifications furnished were of the reasonable value of $107.50. The answer alleged various defenses and contained a counterclaim for damages resulting from alleged insufficiency and incompleteness of the plans and specifications…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Untermyer v. . BeinhauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Jordan v. Estate of WarnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Thayer v. . McNaughtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Klein v. ValeriusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Stilwell v. KelloggWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Town of Burke v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Durwood v. DubinskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Heins v. Thompson & Flieth Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State Ex Rel. Universal Processing Services, LLC v. Circuit Court of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Tietzel v. Southwestern Const. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API