Legal Opinion

Biomet, Inc. v. Fleury

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 28, 2005No. 2D04-5179Published

1Opinion of the Court

CASANUEVA, Judge.

In this products liability and personal injury suit, the defendants, Biomet, Inc. and one of its distributors, Mike Trieste, petition for a writ of certiorari to quash an order granting the motion of the plaintiffs, Norman and Karen Fleury, to compel discovery. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(2)(A). See Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1987); Ameritrust Ins. Corp. v. O’Donnell Landscapes, Inc., 899 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). Biomet and Trieste contend that the order compelling discovery is over-broad and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ameritrust Ins. v. O'Donnell LandscapesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. American Medical Systems v. OsborneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Fleury v. Biomet, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API