State v. JIMENEZ-JARAMILL
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PELLEGRINO, J.
The state of Connecticut appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the charge of creating a public disturbance in violation of General Statutes § 53a-181a brought against the defendant, Luis Jimenez-Jaramill. On appeal, the state contends that the court erred when it (1) summarily dismissed the charge against the defendant sua sponte in the midst of the defendant’s testimony on direct examination and (2) denied the state the opportunity to cross-examine the defendant or present rebuttal testimony prior to rendering the judgment of dismissal. We agree with…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BakerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- State v. AdamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. Glen S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Zuberi v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. JamisonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014