Legal Opinion

Donnelly v. Capodici

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 24, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUMPHREYS, A.J.S.C.

This is a partition action.1 Defendants have agreed to buy plaintiffs’ interest. Plaintiffs have improved the real property, and the improvement has enhanced the value of the property. The issue, novel in New Jersey, is whether the seller is entitled to a credit for that enhanced value. The court finds that a credit should be allowed; otherwise, the buyer would be unjustly enriched.

I

In an earlier decision in this action the court fixed the value of the property and referred certain issues to a Master. Hearings were conducted by the Master. Thereafter he found that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Newman v. ChaseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  2. In Re Marriage of BergerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Baird v. MooreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Lohmann v. LohmannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. STATE OF NJ, ETC. v. Elmwood Terrace, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API